Jan 23, 2008, 01:48 PM
Jan 23, 2008, 02:34 PM
Dorian Gray Wrote:
'Nuff said.
Too bad Fred Thompson dropped out. A lot of hope just went out the window.
Too bad Fred Thompson dropped out. A lot of hope just went out the window.
I don't see any of them really talking on the issues I figure are most important.Our trade with China and the fact that we tend to solve our lack of industry by gambling.Lottery and higher taxes.WE saw the Clinton's at work for about eight years.I am very glad they pardoned all the big time criminals and took the furnature from the Whitehouse and left without an eviction notice. If the choice was between Hillary and the black guy I would vote for the black guy.But I noticed he made a detour to pick up that black trouble maker in NYC to go out to a lunch a few days ago. So that was enough to make me a Republican.
Jan 30, 2008, 08:08 AM
Something to consider... we care who is going to be president because we're concerned how we the people will be treated politically, socially and financially at home. But who we decide to be president will also affect how other countries and religous groups, such as the Muslims, will treat us. I wonder who the radical Islamists are rooting for president here. They may be waiting and hoping for someone like Hillary because they think it will make things easier for them. I have to believe that whether or not we (or maybe just "when") we are attacked again could heavily depend on who's sitting in the White House. Seems perfectly logical to me.
Jan 30, 2008, 10:52 AM
But groups like the radical Islamists WANT war. To them, we are constantly in a state of war. So the only thing they have to consider is who would be better going to war against, a republican or a democrat? If they're backing democrats, then apparently they'd rather fight a democrat than a republican. If you had the chance to pick/endorse your enemies leader, wouldn't you pick the one you thought you could defeat?
Jan 30, 2008, 08:22 PM
Malcolm Wrote:
Dorian Gray Wrote:
But groups like the radical Islamists WANT war. To them, we are constantly in a state of war. So the only thing they have to consider is who would be better going to war against, a republican or a democrat? If they're backing democrats, then apparently they'd rather fight a democrat than a republican. If you had the chance to pick/endorse your enemies leader, wouldn't you pick the one you thought you could defeat?
I suppose, in modern history it would have to be a democratic leader for them. After all, Iran still gloats over the way it stuffed Carter way back.
The liberals are fanatics for gun control/Maybe Hillary and Reno could institute gun control laws in the Mid East and end all those silly conflicts.